Follow by Email

Loading...

Sunday, April 12, 2009

GUILTY LIBERALS

BLOG: Tuesday, January 13, 2009. Anne Coulter is explosive and with her latest book published by Random House, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America ,
ISBN 13: 9780307353467; ISBN 10: 030735346x. If one has a question as to whether or not provocative sales, this lady proves it. . .

Her other best seller books are: High Crimes and Misdemeanors: the Case against Bill Clinton, published in August 1998. Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, published June 2002; Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, published June 2003; How to talk to a Liberal: If you Must, published October 2004. Godless: The Church of Liberalism, published June 2006; and If Democrats Had any Brains: They’d be Republicans, published October 2007.

This time, Some critics say her attacking is over the line. From the various programs that I watched, she is either fanning to be having a nervous breakdown before our very eyes, or either, and you’d have to give it to her, she is over the top and just marketing of her tell all 300 page book, and it just may be another New York Times best seller in the works . . What I can’t understand is she supposes to be a serious political pundit or is this lady a sit down comic. Here is some of her “whimsical” (and I am being nice here) comments:

Ann Coulter believes that Scott McCullum, Bush’s admission of having used cocaine and is disgraceful for writing his book on Bush. She documents in her book the number of Republicans who write against their republican bosses and managers after they go for years taking their paychecks, confidence and wonders why they keep doing this.

Coulter says that “Daniel Moynihan, a democratic cultural analyst said that single parenthood is hurting the US economically. However, when Republican say the same thing they are attacked by the media”. She gives the example of how media went “nuts behind the comment made by Dan Quail toward the Murphy Brown Show.

Scathing criticism of Ann Coulter has been happening all week and it wasn’t any less on Huckabee’s Show but perhaps more amicable. Coulter comes on the show and immediate tells her host he is “too liberal” for her. She says that the watch dog media went after Palin’s family members as soon as we she announced. What was more interesting she says the media didn’t even know her. Her son was accused of being a juvenile delinquent until the media found out that he was on his way to the military. They accused her of her last son not being Palins’ but her daughter’s other child.

Coulter was shown footage when she was called in on the “Huckabee Show” where she called Huckabee “the Republican Jimmy Carter”, and referred to him as “Stupid” and the video added that “he would be great as an evangelical, if he weighed 300 pounds”. Whether she realized that Huckabee had made a large effort to loose weight before entering the presidential race was not mentioned but must have been quite a slap on Huckabee.

Coulter and Huckabee agreed that they want to enlighten the “fair tax” theory that the Republicans wish to implement because the theory does not raise taxes. The fair tax is very conservative approach and the US government shouldn’t raise money off of the American people and the government would have to be more prudent with how they spend tax payers money. Coulter added that “they are stealing from us know. You wouldn’t have so many people not willing to pay their taxes because they would feel the level of payment due was fair across the board and this would cause people to believe the government is being fair. Right now, one person could be paying one amount and another paying a second amount and both would have the same income. If one person has someone instructing them on various loopholes than they may fair better than the person who doesn’t know the loopholes.

Huckabee asked her about being stupid. He asked “Ann, you called me stupid. Am I stupid? And if you think so “look me into my eyes and tell me that I am stupid”. A little giggle, hair flipping later and readjusting her posture she said “No, but you said. . . “ and she trailed off, he asked her again. He offered “Frank Rich, New York Times, the most liberal drama critic likes Huckabee. If he was stupid he would say so. The audience begins to jeer and hiss her. She offered, “you are witty and quick, I’ll take that back and say that instead”. He asked her what was she basing her opinions on. She said, “You were for immigration, that’s what it was. . . you wanted anyone that wanted to come over here to have jobs”. He countered, “I didn’t ever say that, I said that the manner in which we treat people, is the way we can show civility in our Nation”. And he asked again, “what does that have to be with being stupid?” He paused, then sighed running his fingers to the next marker in the her book, “I was supported by Duncan Hunter, Ann and you know how well respected he is in the Republican party”, he waned off, “do you think Ann that with his supporting me that Hunter is also “stupid” because he supported me?”.

She responded, “but you wanted to ban smoking in everyone’s home, that was going to be one of your policies”, before she could finish the sentence he was raising his voice, but not yelling, “Ann, Ann, Ann, I never said that, I never said that. I said that the Federal smoking band in employment would cut down on second hand smoke, I never said that individuals couldn’t smoke in their own homes, not in people’s home”. Shaking his head, Coulter offered that the media doesn’t tell all of the stories and were hammering away at Republicans family members. Giving the example that Joe Biden’s son was being sued by a business partner but it was never mentioned in the campaign. Bottom line she says it is alarming how some presidential candidates were revealed by the media and others were not.

Seemingly ignoring her statement completely, Huckabee offered “I am a conservative just like you Ann”, and he suggested to her read his book which describes him more fully. He then offered, “I am pro life. Here in your book you say I believe in sodomy. Where did you get that from? This is just wrong Ann, Just plain wrong.” She responded, “I heard you were pro choice”. He offered, “Ann, I am pro life. I am not pro sodomy”. Again he said angrily, “If I ever run again I will run as a conservative and he explained that “that when she writes about him that she gets it straight. He exclaimed that she should go after the liberals not him. . “If you have any questions regarding what I believe in, read it, if you have any questions call me, don’t write that I am stupid”. She countered with “well, you sound like you are going to run for office again, are you?” The audience clapped and he responded, “I might run in 2012, but you are not helping me when you write such things”. The audience continued to clap, it was apparent that Huckabee was more disgusted with her then she realized but the program ended amicable. . .

When asked on other shows how she feels regarding Obama, Media, Blago, Bush and Female Victimization this is a sample of her responses:

OBAMA: “You can’t keep voting present, now”.(giggle, giggle giggle).

MEDIA: The main stream media hates conservatives and says so. We didn’t concentrate on the issues. Obama wasn’t asked the issues. He should have been made to address the issues of this country and that should have been the media’s responsibility.

BLAGO: About her opinion of Governor Blagojevich’s impeachment.
“They are all democrats and I don’t care.”

BUSH: We don’t know what the President elect is going to do regarding certain situations we just have to wait the next four years and find out. She never answered the question.

VICTIMIZATION: The best example of this was viewed on “THE VIEW”. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/ann-coulter-on-emthe-view_b_157345.html
The main stream media and liberals want to destroy America. An example of this is the exhalation for the past 30 years of single womanhood. This has been manufactured as a good thing as a result it is destroying America, increasing prison population and destroying the nuclear family.

On “The View” after dodging many of the questions put before her by bringing up “you are attacking me, you are attacking” she gave another name for “female victimization” and the ladies of The View” weren’t buying into her flipping hair, baby do eye routine and dropping her head. It was on . . I guess Whoppi summed it up best, “you can dish it, but you can’t take it”. Where I come from this implies that Coulter is really a big bully but after she attacks, she fails to finish the dozen game she starts and runs off exclaiming she is hurt. Go figure on this one. . .

Coulter is a honors graduate of Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review. She is a legal correspondent for Human Event Magazine and writes a syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate.

Why did I spend this much space on this gutsy woman? BLOG: Tuesday, January 13, 2009. Anne Coulter is explosive and with her latest book published by Random House, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America ,
ISBN 13: 9780307353467; ISBN 10: 030735346x. If one has a question as to whether or not provocative sales, this lady proves it. . .

Her other best seller books are: High Crimes and Misdemeanors: the Case against Bill Clinton, published in August 1998. Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, published June 2002; Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, published June 2003; How to talk to a Liberal: If you Must, published October 2004. Godless: The Church of Liberalism, published June 2006; and If Democrats Had any Brains: They’d be Republicans, published October 2007.

This time, Some critics say her attacking is over the line. From the various programs that I watched, she is either fanning to be having a nervous breakdown before our very eyes, or either, and you’d have to give it to her, she is over the top and just marketing of her tell all 300 page book, and it just may be another New York Times best seller in the works . . What I can’t understand is she supposes to be a serious political pundit or is this lady a sit down comic. Here is some of her “whimsical” (and I am being nice here) comments:

Ann Coulter believes that Scott McCullum, Bush’s admission of having used cocaine and is disgraceful for writing his book on Bush. She documents in her book the number of Republicans who write against their republican bosses and managers after they go for years taking their paychecks, confidence and wonders why they keep doing this.

Coulter says that “Daniel Moynihan, a democratic cultural analyst said that single parenthood is hurting the US economically. However, when Republican say the same thing they are attacked by the media”. She gives the example of how media went “nuts behind the comment made by Dan Quail toward the Murphy Brown Show.

Scathing criticism of Ann Coulter has been happening all week and it wasn’t any less on Huckabee’s Show but perhaps more amicable. Coulter comes on the show and immediate tells her host he is “too liberal” for her. She says that the watch dog media went after Palin’s family members as soon as we she announced. What was more interesting she says the media didn’t even know her. Her son was accused of being a juvenile delinquent until the media found out that he was on his way to the military. They accused her of her last son not being Palins’ but her daughter’s other child.

Coulter was shown footage when she was called in on the “Huckabee Show” where she called Huckabee “the Republican Jimmy Carter”, and referred to him as “Stupid” and the video added that “he would be great as an evangelical, if he weighed 300 pounds”. Whether she realized that Huckabee had made a large effort to loose weight before entering the presidential race was not mentioned but must have been quite a slap on Huckabee.

Coulter and Huckabee agreed that they want to enlighten the “fair tax” theory that the Republicans wish to implement because the theory does not raise taxes. The fair tax is very conservative approach and the US government shouldn’t raise money off of the American people and the government would have to be more prudent with how they spend tax payers money. Coulter added that “they are stealing from us know. You wouldn’t have so many people not willing to pay their taxes because they would feel the level of payment due was fair across the board and this would cause people to believe the government is being fair. Right now, one person could be paying one amount and another paying a second amount and both would have the same income. If one person has someone instructing them on various loopholes than they may fair better than the person who doesn’t know the loopholes.

Huckabee asked her about being stupid. He asked “Ann, you called me stupid. Am I stupid? And if you think so “look me into my eyes and tell me that I am stupid”. A little giggle, hair flipping later and readjusting her posture she said “No, but you said. . . “ and she trailed off, he asked her again. He offered “Frank Rich, New York Times, the most liberal drama critic likes Huckabee. If he was stupid he would say so. The audience begins to jeer and hiss her. She offered, “you are witty and quick, I’ll take that back and say that instead”. He asked her what was she basing her opinions on. She said, “You were for immigration, that’s what it was. . . you wanted anyone that wanted to come over here to have jobs”. He countered, “I didn’t ever say that, I said that the manner in which we treat people, is the way we can show civility in our Nation”. And he asked again, “what does that have to be with being stupid?” He paused, then sighed running his fingers to the next marker in the her book, “I was supported by Duncan Hunter, Ann and you know how well respected he is in the Republican party”, he waned off, “do you think Ann that with his supporting me that Hunter is also “stupid” because he supported me?”.

She responded, “but you wanted to ban smoking in everyone’s home, that was going to be one of your policies”, before she could finish the sentence he was raising his voice, but not yelling, “Ann, Ann, Ann, I never said that, I never said that. I said that the Federal smoking band in employment would cut down on second hand smoke, I never said that individuals couldn’t smoke in their own homes, not in people’s home”. Shaking his head, Coulter offered that the media doesn’t tell all of the stories and were hammering away at Republicans family members. Giving the example that Joe Biden’s son was being sued by a business partner but it was never mentioned in the campaign. Bottom line she says it is alarming how some presidential candidates were revealed by the media and others were not.

Seemingly ignoring her statement completely, Huckabee offered “I am a conservative just like you Ann”, and he suggested to her read his book which describes him more fully. He then offered, “I am pro life. Here in your book you say I believe in sodomy. Where did you get that from? This is just wrong Ann, Just plain wrong.” She responded, “I heard you were pro choice”. He offered, “Ann, I am pro life. I am not pro sodomy”. Again he said angrily, “If I ever run again I will run as a conservative and he explained that “that when she writes about him that she gets it straight. He exclaimed that she should go after the liberals not him. . “If you have any questions regarding what I believe in, read it, if you have any questions call me, don’t write that I am stupid”. She countered with “well, you sound like you are going to run for office again, are you?” The audience clapped and he responded, “I might run in 2012, but you are not helping me when you write such things”. The audience continued to clap, it was apparent that Huckabee was more disgusted with her then she realized but the program ended amicable. . .

When asked on other shows how she feels regarding Obama, Media, Blago, Bush and Female Victimization this is a sample of her responses:

OBAMA: “You can’t keep voting present, now”.(giggle, giggle giggle).

MEDIA: The main stream media hates conservatives and says so. We didn’t concentrate on the issues. Obama wasn’t asked the issues. He should have been made to address the issues of this country and that should have been the media’s responsibility.

BLAGO: About her opinion of Governor Blagojevich’s impeachment.
“They are all democrats and I don’t care.”

BUSH: We don’t know what the President elect is going to do regarding certain situations we just have to wait the next four years and find out. She never answered the question.

VICTIMIZATION: The best example of this was viewed on “THE VIEW”. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/ann-coulter-on-emthe-view_b_157345.html
The main stream media and liberals want to destroy America. An example of this is the exhalation for the past 30 years of single womanhood. This has been manufactured as a good thing as a result it is destroying America, increasing prison population and destroying the nuclear family.

On “The View” after dodging many of the questions put before her by bringing up “you are attacking me, you are attacking” she gave another name for “female victimization” and the ladies of The View” weren’t buying into her flipping hair, baby do eye routine and dropping her head. It was on . . I guess Whoppi summed it up best, “you can dish it, but you can’t take it”. Where I come from this implies that Coulter is really a big bully but after she attacks, she fails to finish the dozen game she starts and runs off exclaiming she is hurt. Go figure on this one. . .

Coulter is a honors graduate of Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review. She is a legal correspondent for Human Event Magazine and writes a syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate.

Why did I spend this much space on this gutsy woman? BLOG: Tuesday, January 13, 2009. Anne Coulter is explosive and with her latest book published by Random House, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America ,
ISBN 13: 9780307353467; ISBN 10: 030735346x. If one has a question as to whether or not provocative sales, this lady proves it. . .

Her other best seller books are: High Crimes and Misdemeanors: the Case against Bill Clinton, published in August 1998. Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right, published June 2002; Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, published June 2003; How to talk to a Liberal: If you Must, published October 2004. Godless: The Church of Liberalism, published June 2006; and If Democrats Had any Brains: They’d be Republicans, published October 2007.

This time, Some critics say her attacking is over the line. From the various programs that I watched, she is either fanning to be having a nervous breakdown before our very eyes, or either, and you’d have to give it to her, she is over the top and just marketing of her tell all 300 page book, and it just may be another New York Times best seller in the works . . What I can’t understand is she supposes to be a serious political pundit or is this lady a sit down comic. Here is some of her “whimsical” (and I am being nice here) comments:

Ann Coulter believes that Scott McCullum, Bush’s admission of having used cocaine and is disgraceful for writing his book on Bush. She documents in her book the number of Republicans who write against their republican bosses and managers after they go for years taking their paychecks, confidence and wonders why they keep doing this.

Coulter says that “Daniel Moynihan, a democratic cultural analyst said that single parenthood is hurting the US economically. However, when Republican say the same thing they are attacked by the media”. She gives the example of how media went “nuts behind the comment made by Dan Quail toward the Murphy Brown Show.

Scathing criticism of Ann Coulter has been happening all week and it wasn’t any less on Huckabee’s Show but perhaps more amicable. Coulter comes on the show and immediate tells her host he is “too liberal” for her. She says that the watch dog media went after Palin’s family members as soon as we she announced. What was more interesting she says the media didn’t even know her. Her son was accused of being a juvenile delinquent until the media found out that he was on his way to the military. They accused her of her last son not being Palins’ but her daughter’s other child.

Coulter was shown footage when she was called in on the “Huckabee Show” where she called Huckabee “the Republican Jimmy Carter”, and referred to him as “Stupid” and the video added that “he would be great as an evangelical, if he weighed 300 pounds”. Whether she realized that Huckabee had made a large effort to loose weight before entering the presidential race was not mentioned but must have been quite a slap on Huckabee.

Coulter and Huckabee agreed that they want to enlighten the “fair tax” theory that the Republicans wish to implement because the theory does not raise taxes. The fair tax is very conservative approach and the US government shouldn’t raise money off of the American people and the government would have to be more prudent with how they spend tax payers money. Coulter added that “they are stealing from us know. You wouldn’t have so many people not willing to pay their taxes because they would feel the level of payment due was fair across the board and this would cause people to believe the government is being fair. Right now, one person could be paying one amount and another paying a second amount and both would have the same income. If one person has someone instructing them on various loopholes than they may fair better than the person who doesn’t know the loopholes.

Huckabee asked her about being stupid. He asked “Ann, you called me stupid. Am I stupid? And if you think so “look me into my eyes and tell me that I am stupid”. A little giggle, hair flipping later and readjusting her posture she said “No, but you said. . . “ and she trailed off, he asked her again. He offered “Frank Rich, New York Times, the most liberal drama critic likes Huckabee. If he was stupid he would say so. The audience begins to jeer and hiss her. She offered, “you are witty and quick, I’ll take that back and say that instead”. He asked her what was she basing her opinions on. She said, “You were for immigration, that’s what it was. . . you wanted anyone that wanted to come over here to have jobs”. He countered, “I didn’t ever say that, I said that the manner in which we treat people, is the way we can show civility in our Nation”. And he asked again, “what does that have to be with being stupid?” He paused, then sighed running his fingers to the next marker in the her book, “I was supported by Duncan Hunter, Ann and you know how well respected he is in the Republican party”, he waned off, “do you think Ann that with his supporting me that Hunter is also “stupid” because he supported me?”.

She responded, “but you wanted to ban smoking in everyone’s home, that was going to be one of your policies”, before she could finish the sentence he was raising his voice, but not yelling, “Ann, Ann, Ann, I never said that, I never said that. I said that the Federal smoking band in employment would cut down on second hand smoke, I never said that individuals couldn’t smoke in their own homes, not in people’s home”. Shaking his head, Coulter offered that the media doesn’t tell all of the stories and were hammering away at Republicans family members. Giving the example that Joe Biden’s son was being sued by a business partner but it was never mentioned in the campaign. Bottom line she says it is alarming how some presidential candidates were revealed by the media and others were not.

Seemingly ignoring her statement completely, Huckabee offered “I am a conservative just like you Ann”, and he suggested to her read his book which describes him more fully. He then offered, “I am pro life. Here in your book you say I believe in sodomy. Where did you get that from? This is just wrong Ann, Just plain wrong.” She responded, “I heard you were pro choice”. He offered, “Ann, I am pro life. I am not pro sodomy”. Again he said angrily, “If I ever run again I will run as a conservative and he explained that “that when she writes about him that she gets it straight. He exclaimed that she should go after the liberals not him. . “If you have any questions regarding what I believe in, read it, if you have any questions call me, don’t write that I am stupid”. She countered with “well, you sound like you are going to run for office again, are you?” The audience clapped and he responded, “I might run in 2012, but you are not helping me when you write such things”. The audience continued to clap, it was apparent that Huckabee was more disgusted with her then she realized but the program ended amicable. . .

When asked on other shows how she feels regarding Obama, Media, Blago, Bush and Female Victimization this is a sample of her responses:

OBAMA: “You can’t keep voting present, now”.(giggle, giggle giggle).

MEDIA: The main stream media hates conservatives and says so. We didn’t concentrate on the issues. Obama wasn’t asked the issues. He should have been made to address the issues of this country and that should have been the media’s responsibility.

BLAGO: About her opinion of Governor Blagojevich’s impeachment.
“They are all democrats and I don’t care.”

BUSH: We don’t know what the President elect is going to do regarding certain situations we just have to wait the next four years and find out. She never answered the question.

VICTIMIZATION: The best example of this was viewed on “THE VIEW”. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/ann-coulter-on-emthe-view_b_157345.html
The main stream media and liberals want to destroy America. An example of this is the exhalation for the past 30 years of single womanhood. This has been manufactured as a good thing as a result it is destroying America, increasing prison population and destroying the nuclear family.

On “The View” after dodging many of the questions put before her by bringing up “you are attacking me, you are attacking” she gave another name for “female victimization” and the ladies of The View” weren’t buying into her flipping hair, baby do eye routine and dropping her head. It was on . . I guess Whoppi summed it up best, “you can dish it, but you can’t take it”. Where I come from this implies that Coulter is really a big bully but after she attacks, she fails to finish the dozen game she starts and runs off exclaiming she is hurt. Go figure on this one. . .

Coulter is a honors graduate of Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review. She is a legal correspondent for Human Event Magazine and writes a syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate.

Why did I spend this much space on this gutsy woman?

ARGENTINA DON'T CRY FOR UNCLE SAM


Milton Friedman may be rolling over in his grave in excitement but in the meantime I received part one of a video from a friend on an international economist named Adrian Salbuchi- he said don’t walk, run and get your money out of the bank, buy anything that you like of value in your culture, don’t leave it to them (the financial institutions) to leverage with your money. “Take your money out”.
Based on what I can remember in finance class Friedman was the father of the Argentina economic currency problems. Salbuchi says we are seeing the whole Global financial system melting down due to extreme capitalism that Friedman wrote about. He says that Argentina has gone through this very flawed financial model three times. He says when the Finance system has usurped the real economy, trouble will always follow.

Salbuchi says that “capital finance versus economics is a tumor and it has matisticized in the United States. It will implode on itself, guaranteed. Maddoff perpetuated a Ponzi Scheme and he is certainly not the only person who has done this, he is just one more prolific and most “revealed”.

Salbuchi continues that Maddoff and Associates discovered the flaw in the capitalistic system, took full advantage of it, and became not only greedy but he became greedy with other people’s money. Salbuchi says that a pyramid has a base of four sides. He exclaims that the first side in the pyramid is called the “Planned money inefficiency side” which is determined by the State (or government) and is based on legal tender. The planned side is the actual value or face value of the item being placed on the market. The US naturally does this by the instructions of the Federal Reserve Bank which isn’t a federal reserve or a bank and the US Central banks. The money is supposed to be equal to the items being exchanged. He moves on . . .

2nd side of the pyramid is “base private money”. The private banking system exerts power over the bank. It will always be fractionalizing compared to the reserve system with huge interest being charged on the money that is being borrowed against. The down side of this system is the bank can determine at what level they will charge the individual, institution or corporation for the money needed. Often this percentage or interest rate is based on the demand of the market for money. He adds . . .

3rd side of the pyramid is called the “funny-money side”. The objective is to do everything by debt, as long as the banker or other financial institutions are able to determine the individual, institute or corporation’s worth. The amount of money being issued will vary according to the borrower’s proven past experience or wealth. The system’s down side is to keep the consumer in debt and hand them credit. If the government has to do anything here, it assists the banks in increasing the indebtedness of its citizens with the banks. If the individual is insisting upon having certain services and products then the bank will allow the individual to have the money based on their future ability to pay the money back or knowing that the individual has something else in exchange for the amount of money being requested. Being that the consumer has the opportunity to go to more than one institution for the funds, the consumer must remember that “they will have to pay it back, someday, some how”. The down side to this part of the system, the individual or institutions may be greedy and be requesting more than what they can afford, leading to bankruptcy and the same bank having the ability to buy back their assets for penny’s on the dollar.

He continued that “You may remember the old adage, your eyes are as big as your stomach. With this ability, the financial institution is in the position to sell the items seized to their more profitable debtors who can afford to buy the seized items in bulk. The indebtedness will also keep pushing the interest rates on top of the actual money that was borrowed.

What I have learned is that 20 years ago there wasn’t a derivative market. Some were called swaps. By September 2008, there were $531 trillion dollars in derivatives that equates to 10x’s the world gross domestic and the American base is 40x’s America’s world gross domestic product.

Salbuchi says that even with Obama’s best intent, “There is no way that Obama can be solve this crisis”, because the product and services are not available to fill this inflated gap, Obama can only hope that people and institutions go back to saving, utilizing their assets with great caution and that slowly institutions who have borrowed extremely high to their means, dissolve, and fade away. The problem Salbuchi says with this concept, is that the borrowing is so gigantic, the indebtedness is so incredibly complicated and interactive, that no one in the American government is willing to say so. So, the bottom must be found to develop a “zero”. We can start from some semblance of zero and rebuild with prudence and certainty, however when we know the banks, Federal Reserve and corporate leaders aren’t willing to be ethical or provide the truth where do you begin?
The 4th side of the pyramid or he calls the “privatization of the channels for the private sector”, is when the market gets to the point of exploding on itself and collapses completely. This is when socialization comes in, the government lends from the Federal Reserve bank, central bank and individual taxes are heavily utilized to match the market requirements.

Salbuchi says that Argentina has gone through this process three times and they know the effects of the “great Ponzi scheme”, it will lead to a run on the banks. The devaluing of the currency, the changing of the currency (to wipe the past away) and to reissue currency.

Every since Reagan there has been a cabal of individuals who have been trying to take over the privatization of American markets. Salbuchi believes, they had already taken over the banks, go do your homework on how the Federal Reserve Bank was acclimated with Roosevelt in the early 1920’s he suggests. “Be mindful of where the economic stimulus package funds are coming from,” he offers.
An Argentine opinion on the Global Financial Crisis, is basically describing the whole Global Financial System, which is only one vast Ponzi Scheme. You get yours before the person down the food change get’s theirs is what I gathered from the video’s Part one. What I concluded from all that I have read is to make sure I am financially solvent, that I am not in debt at all and if I do have debt, that it is not in the form of high interest credit card loans. If I have any high interest loans, try to pay them off immediately and with my decent credit, find a lower interest consolidated loan and don’t miss any payments. This is how the rich get richer!

RESOURCES: Part One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlDNMB6wYmI
Part Two: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/global-financial-collapse-salbuchi-part-2/4262926377

When you finish watching these let me know what you think . . . Minerva

Monday, April 6, 2009

RUSH OR STEEL

You won’t have the last word with the person with the microphone and in this technological world you would think that Michael Steele would know this. However the Democrats are spending money on a billboard in Rush Limbaugh’s home town admonishing him for the comments he made about Obama’s Administration hopefully failing. The billboard I find a total waste of time and money and when asked in a special poll, I said so. But I didn’t stop there; I told them where they could have spent the money. Whether or not they listen, come on, you know they won’t but I felt good filling out the email form saying so.
When you don’t know the head of your party, inner turmoil and spinning out of control seem to be most visible and this is what we are watching. Rush has become the voice of the Republican Party. Can you believe this? Many commentaries are saying that this was the worst start for Steele, the new Chair of the Republican National Party. Saying that his job was to tick people off was obviously a mistake, even though he was being frank. Michael Steele made another mistake of taking his eyes off of his role as chair of the Republican party by taking on Rush publicly. The transitional role that Steele needs to include to stop the in-house fighting, however having him head of the party is still questionable as to whether it indicates that the party will make them appear to be diverse.
Tavis Smiley approached the subject and added that Symbolism does matter but is weak without substance. The policies the Republican Party have missed the representation of the American people. They have been acting more like obstructionist with the economic stimulus rather than getting over the election results and realizing we are all in this economic soup together. Smiley says The Covenant, was book # 1 explored these concerns; the second book was the Covenent in Action. ISBN-13: 9781401918521; ISBN-10: 1401918522; Publisher: Smiley Books; Date: February 2007; Page Count: 190. And the third book in Smiley’s trilogy is called Accountable, Making America as Good as Its Promise. Accountable (with co-author Stephanie Robinson) lays out Obama’s policies, framework for the assessment, and yard stick of celebration, providing Obama does all that he says he was going to do while campaigning. Published in February 2009; ISBN-10:1439100020; ISBN 13: 9781439100028; Suggested price $19.99
The question is, will Obama be able to fulfill those policies. Tavis says that Obama has to be accountable for the next moves of the nation. . . The promise of and possibility of America are still as divisive as ever before but something that we all have to strive to correct. . .
Do I think that Tavis is in love with Obama? No! I believe he hopes that Obama can overcome the obstacles against him, but no one expected the global economy to be one of those obstacles, remember in those days, it was ending the disputable Iraqi War. Tavis was a Hillary and Bill Clinton fan. Saving the world, well I believe Obama will have to find that superman suit because the residuals involved in some people’s money is quite tricky and more contentious because it hits at the heart of all of 300,000,000 Americans, not just 5,000 men and women in military uniform not receiving proper medical care and insurance.
Making America accountable is the final book of a trilogy addressing the problems in America. Tavis’s books can be found purchased through Amazon, Barnes and Noble, in audio and on Kindle. John Thune is another person in the Republican party, whose name has been bantered back and forth as the new voice for the Republican Party, is implying that Michael Steele may be asked to step down. We’ll have to stay tune on this political outcome.

Steele enjoys playing chess with the Big Boys

BLOG Wednesday, March 25, 2009 I caught a video conversation Don Lemon of CNN news was having with Wolfe Blitzer. Lemon says that his response with Michael Steele, RN chair was quiet revealing when Steele offered that “I’m a cause and affect kind of guy”. Steele says that there is a logic behind his attacking Rush Limbaugh a couple weeks ago. Steele says that when he did this he was testing the landscape. He wanted to know who would yell the loudest as well as support him. He says he sees his next move as understanding his position on the chess board. At first, he said he wanted to see “Who are inside the tent with him and who are not”. By his testing the waters, he has a better understanding as to “how strategically he needs to play his next move. “ Lemon says that when asked whether or not Steele was interested in being a Republican Presidential candidate, Steele says that “if that is where God wants him to go, after conversation with his wife and children”. Steele continued that politics aren’t what they use to be. “There are so many moving parts and often you can’t keep up with everything that is going on so far in advance.” So is Michael Steele seeing that if the landscape was good enough for Obama that the landscape is good enough for him? For is Steele just drumming up support in a “stealthy way”?